As the temperature drops below zero, Yellowstone bison are traversing to lower elevations in search of grass and warmer temperatures. Unfortunately, for 900 of these bison, they will be captured and shipped to slaughter. The rest will be hazed back into Yellowstone National Park once the warmth of spring rolls around–unless Montana Governor Bullock decides to allow Yellowstone bison year-round habitat on Montana lands immediately adjacent to the Park.
For well over a year, the State of Montana failed to act on a joint environmental assessment for year-round habitat for Yellowstone bison. Drafted by the Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, and the Department of Livestock, this historic proposal received over 100,000 comments, most of which were in favor of the biggest expansion, Alternative B. In early 2014, the decision passed on to the Board of Livestock to pick a preferred alternative. In front of them was a compromised proposal of tiering habitat expansion to a decrease in population numbers. Despite this, the Board failed to act.
Seven months later, the State released an “Addendum to the Year-round Bison Habitat Draft Joint Environmental Assessment.” In this addendum, FWP and DoL added an additional alternative, Alternative G. Alternative G is based off of the compromised proposal set before the Board of Livestock. In this, if the bison population is over 4,500, they get no expanded habitat and bison management continues as usual. With the proposed winter slaughter of 900 bison, the population will drop to 4,000, opening up Horse Butte year-round. Hazing in the spring will still need to occur, to chase the bison on areas outside the “tolerance” areas and into Horse Butte and the Park. If the population falls below 3,500, the habitat expands from Horse Butte up towards the Taylor Fork near Highway 191. If the bison population rises above 4,500, bison management continues as usual with hazing and no expanded habitat.The State fails to provide a reason why less bison will trigger habitat expansion.
Expanded habitat for bison offers many benefits, including a reduction in costs associated with the hazing and slaughtering of bison. This benefit is negated by the State’s “attempt.”
The State is opening up a 30-day comment period, which closes December 11. We urge the Governor to heed to the tens of thousands comments received in support of expanded habitat. Click on this link to submit a public comment online. You can also mail comments to:
MFWP – Bison Addendum
PO Box 200701
Helena MT, 59620
Kiersten Iwai is Sierra Club’s GYE organizer. Questions, comments, want to help out? Contact her at firstname.lastname@example.org, or give her a call at (406) 582-8365 x2.
Despite being exhausted and hungry, we arrived at our camp in high spirits. The intoxicating feeling of adventuring in the backcountry poured through us as we pitched our tents and started a fire. Night was quickly upon us, followed by light snow flakes that blanketed the fields and trees.
This past weekend, the Sierra Club’s Our Wild America campaign partnered with the Wilderness Club at Montana State University to backpack into Ramshorn Lake in the Gallatin Range. After a steep summit to Ramshorn Peak, we hiked along the ridge, marveling at the spectacular views and diverse geology. We found petrified wood and a fossilized feather, many burs that stuck to our pants and mud that caked our boots, and drainages and rock screes. We passed a trio of hunters packing out a mountain goat, finding the leftover guts along the way. Birds soared overhead, and we knew other wildlife was likely nearby. We saw herds of mountain goats; their balance and grace amazing us as they moved around the steep unstable mountainside. We, on the other hand, stumbled around, slipping and sliding.
We were nine young people, seeking an escape from the routine tasks the normal week brings and the opportunity to truly feel alive in the wild. We bonded and together we overcame our challenges and obstacles with positive attitudes and smiles. Despite varying levels of hiking experience and gear, the MSU students stuck together and helped to assure all participants were able to complete the rigorous journey over the ridge and to our backcountry camp.
We awoke the next morning to four inches of snow on the ground, and with a couple more inches falling throughout the morning. Fortunately, we had the hot blaze of a fire to keep us warm. The stark contrast between the sunny dry Saturday to the frozen palace on Sunday reminded us how quickly things change in the mountains.
Ramshorn Lake is in the core of the Gallatin Range, and the Hyalite Porcupine Buffalo Horn Wilderness Study Area. Just a few miles north of Yellowstone National Park, this area serves as crucial habitat for wildlife migrating to and from the park. The future of the WSA remains unknown, but it’s easy to see how permanent protection is needed.
I often hear how people want to protect our lands and watersheds for future generations–not only the chance to have clean air and clean water, but to pass along the same recreational opportunities to explore and heal. Well, the future generation is here. We are that future generation–we are your children, your grandkids, and your future in-laws. We care about the future of our backyard, the fate the Gallatin Range. But many are also disillusioned by the political process and the exclusivity of politics. We get blamed for problems of today’s society that we were born into and we will be the ones who face the consequences.
And yes, many of us are apathetic and apolitical. It can be so easy to get lost in the steady rhythm of work, classes, and friends. Once the workday ends, it can be so easy to just hit the trails and not think about the threats. It can be so easy to grab a beer with friends and watch the football game, oblivious to the world outside. But at the same time, aren’t we all like that, no matter what age?
We are the solutions and have the energy needed to carry on an environmental stewardship ethic of caring for the planet. But first we need those openings; those chances to be involved in a space that we feel comfortable in: those openings that allow our voices to be heard and valued.
So as I write this, I’m dreaming about the next adventure, the next peak to summit, and the next drainage to follow. I’m dreaming about roasting marshmallows over a crackling fire, and the fresh snow that will soon fall on our mountains. I’m dreaming how we can connect all those who love the Gallatin Range and work together to protect it forever.
Kiersten Iwai is one of the Sierra Club’s GYE organizers. Questions, comments, want to help out? Contact her at email@example.com, or give her a call at (406) 582-8365 x2.
Wolves in Wyoming got a rare break yesterday when a federal judge reinstated federal protections for the animal. The judge ruled that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service erred in removing federal Endangered Species Act protections from wolves in favor of the state’s wolf management plan in 2012. Represented by Earthjustice, Sierra Club and several partners including Natural Resources Defense Council, Defenders of Wildlife, and the Center for Biological Diversity challenged the delisting based on deep flaws in Wyoming’s management plan.
In her ruling United States District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson noted that the Service was “arbitrary and capricious” in accepting Wyoming’s management plan based solely on the state’s intentions to manage for a viable wolf population, and that “the Service cannot rely solely on an unenforceable promise as a basis to delist a species.”
As a result of the decision, Endangered Species Act protections were reinstated immediately and wolves are now back under federal management in Wyoming. That’s where they belong, until Wyoming gets it right and develops an enforceable plan that will maintain a healthy population of wolves. Under the state’s now-rejected plan Wyoming was required to maintain just 10 breeding pairs and 100 wolves outside of Yellowstone National Park and the Wind River Indian Reservation. Wolves could be killed by virtually any means anytime without a license in over eighty percent of the state – the so-called “predator zone.” In the rest of Wyoming around Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks, wolves could be hunted as “trophy game.” Since the loss of protections in 2012, over 200 wolves have been killed under state management.
But today, wolves are protected once again in Wyoming, and that is good news indeed. Wolves are a key part of the fabric that makes Greater Yellowstone such a special and unique place, and they deserved to be treated as the majestic creatures they are.
Senior Representative, Our Wild America campaign – Bozeman, MT
For the third time in five years, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has increased the ‘incidental take,’ or the number of grizzly bears they anticipate will be killed, as a result of conflicts with livestock in the Upper Green area of the Bridger Teton National Forest in northwest Wyoming. The Upper Green has the highest number of conflicts in the entire Greater Yellowstone region, yet the agency has once again failed to require any meaningful measures to reduce those conflicts with livestock being grazed on public land. At least fifteen grizzly bears have been intentionally killed in the Upper Green because of conflicts with livestock since 2010.
Because Yellowstone grizzlies are protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), any federal action that could jeopardize the continued existence of the species and/or its habitat must be evaluated. If it is determined that the action (in this case, livestock grazing), will not jeopardize the species but could result in ‘take’ of the species, the take must be quantified and an exemption from the Act is granted.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has repeatedly raised the number of bears that can be killed in the Upper Green while failing yet again to require measures to reduce conflicts. The title itself of the just-released decision tells the story: “Biological Opinion for the 2014 Supplement to the 2013 Supplement and 2010 Amendment to the 1999 Biological Assessment for Livestock Grazing on the Northern Portions of the Pinedale Ranger District.” In 2011, the incidental take limit of six bears was exceeded the following year, even though the term of the take statement was 10 years, through 2020. In 2013, a new take statement upped the take to 11 bears, which was supposed to be through 2017, but by earlier this month, six grizzlies had already been killed. And now in 2014, the agency has allowed another 11 bears to be killed in the next three years. According to the agencies, the Yellowstone grizzly population is ‘recovered,’ (though it remains on the Endangered Species List), and the Upper Green grizzlies are viewed as ‘extra’ bears.
Sierra Club and several other non-governmental organizations are pushing the agencies for more requirements to actually reduce conflicts, instead of ignoring the problem and simply raising the take. The Forest Service, as the agency that grants grazing permits on the lands the agency manages, has the authority to require livestock producers to do more to reduce conflicts. So does the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which has the ultimate authority over species protected under the ESA. The only meaningful measure in recent years that has been required, night penning of sheep, has been effective in reducing conflicts when done correctly. Now, however nearly all the conflicts are with cattle, and nothing further is being required, or even attempted, by either agency to resolve conflicts between grizzlies and cattle.
Though every situation and landscape is unique, conflict reduction measures have been proven to work elsewhere. Altering grazing patterns, having more riders with livestock, use of guard dogs and other methods have been effective. Federal agencies and the producers who graze their cattle on public lands in the Upper Green should be actively working to find solutions instead of ignoring the problem and killing more bears, particularly a threatened species trying to survive on public lands. The Upper Green has more conflicts than anywhere else in Greater Yellowstone. This is where solutions are needed most. But unfortunately for grizzly bears, federal agencies have once again bowed to political pressure and increased the number of grizzly bears that can be killed in the Upper Green while avoiding the hard work of finding real and lasting solutions.
- Bonnie Rice, Senior Representative Our Wild America campaign
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has repeatedly increased livestock-related incidental take of grizzly bears in the Upper Green:
USFWS 1999 Biological Opinion/Incidental Take Statement, 5 grizzly bears; met or exceeded.
USFWS 2011 Biological Opinion/Incidental Take Statement, 2011-2020: 6 grizzly bears within any 3 consecutive years; exceeded in 2012.
USFWS Amended Biological Opinion/Incidental Take Statement, September 2012 through 2012 grazing season: 3 grizzly bears
USFWS 2013 Biological Opinion/Incidental Take Statement, 2013-2017: 11 grizzly bears in any 3 consecutive years, with no more than 3 of the 11 being females; 6 bears, including 2 females, killed by August 2014.
USFWS 2014 Biological Opinion/Incidental Take Statement, 2014-2019: 11 grizzly bears in any 3 consecutive years
by Phil Knight
Francs Peak, monarch of the Absaroka Range, tops thirteen thousand feet on the high divide between the Greybull and Wood Rivers. Walking the summit ridge with Kim Wilbert and Bryce Born this month, I could cast my vision across vast, remote mountain country, some of the wildest and least known terrain in the lower 48. “Bryce, check it out! It’s a grizzly!” I pointed down the steep west slope of Francs to a brown, moving blob in the talus. “Sure enough, and she’s got a cub!” Bryce exclaimed. Just then, Kim, a little bit behind us on the ridge, peered through his spotting scope and exclaimed “Guys, I’ve got seven grizzlies!!”
The bears were gathered on these steep slopes to gobble up fat army cutworm moths, one of their most important food sources. As we looked around we found grizzly scat right on the summit ridge. Gazing down at a huge boar on on a snowfield a quarter mile below us, we hoped he would stay down there.
We’d approached the peak from the Wood River and base camped in the gorgeous Meadow Creek Basin. Coyotes howled at us, mule deer bucks bedded down by the krummholz, a bull elk showed off his growing rack, and a nasty hail and thunder storm blasted us in the evening, giving Kim a serious pummeling as he was hanging our food. We woke at 4 AM to a full moon and more howling, and summited before 9 AM, seeking to beat the afternoon storms.
Difficult access keeps this place pretty quiet. Yet it’s not designated Wilderness, and the Shoshone National Forest has some hair brained scheme to increase off road vehicle us here. The terrain is not suited to such – it’s extremely steep and cliffy – and such a spectacular place surely deserves better than more over-priced toys spewing exhaust and tearing up trails.
It seemed early in the season for bears to be eating moths. But some of their other food sources are getting harder to find. Cutthroat trout are being devoured by invasive lake trout in Yellowstone Lake. Elk herds have diminished, partly due to predation by bears. Whitebark pines, source of nourishing pine nuts, are succumbing to the quadruple threat of blister rust, pine bark beetles, wildfire and extreme weather (avalanches and windstorms).
This is Bryce and Kims’ stomping ground, but I had not been in the South Absaroka since 1991. Since then, forests across the region have been devastated by insects and fire. In the upper Wood River, most of the spruce forests is toast – the ghost town of Kirwin is surrounded by the bleak, grey trunks of a once-thriving forest. This is some of the worst forest die off I’ve seen anywhere. It’s like a hot, evil wind has blasted the land, killing off the larger trees en masse.
Even here, far from the teaming human hordes, the impacts of industrial, petroleum-based civilization is imprinted on the land. Yet get above treeline, and it feels as wild as any place I have been. Wilderness hangs on despite our best efforts to tame everything. Bears find food and increase their numbers, even when some of their favorite foods are nearly gone. Nature is resilient, and the weeds and wilderness long will live.
As I was driving out though the gorgeous Wood River valley, a huge, dark bull moose appeared along the road, and as I stopped the car he ran right past me. His noble presence could not have offered a more dramatic contrast to the noisy, ugly oil pumpjacks lining the road. The moose jumped one fence, crossed the road behind me, jumped another, and, skirting the pumpjacks, made it to the sanctuary of the Wood River.
The harder we press it, the more nature will respond. The question is, how will it respond? With resilience, or with diminishment? And how far can we push the resilient side of nature, before it bites back?
Phil Knight is a thirty year resident of Greater Yellowstone and a member of the delivery team for the Sierra Club’s Greater Yellowstone Campaign.
If you’re in Seattle you’ve probably seen billboard advertisements highlighting the beauty of Montana, with a #MontanaMoment.. One billboard shows a herd of bison roaming a Yellowstone landscape. Ironically, bison don’t really roam free as the advertisement suggests.
In response, our campaign, alongside the Gallatin Wildlife Association authored an op-ed in the Seattle Times. We argue how “Science, economics, public opinion and common sense make clear that opening up significant year-round bison habitat in areas without livestock conflicts is the logical path forward. Doing so would give the state more management options and flexibility. More fair-chase hunting opportunities would be created. Fewer taxpayer dollars would be wasted on unnecessary hazing, capture and slaughter. Wild bison would finally be allowed to roam portions of Montana, bringing ecological and economic benefits and sharing the landscape with all of the other wild animals that call Montana home.”
Tourism is the money maker in Montana, representing 70% of the State’s revenue (Lamar Advertising). It makes sense that the State is targeting cities with residents who would be enticed by beautiful landscapes and scenes of wildlife. What doesn’t make sense is the State’s treatment of bison.
Governor Steve Bullock has the authority to allow the bison to roam. So why hasn’t he yet?
Kiersten Iwai is the Sierra Club’s GYE campaign’s newest organizer. Questions, comments, want to help out? Contact her at firstname.lastname@example.org.
When I was sixteen, my family took a road trip to Yellowstone National Park. I watched in awe at the herds of bison roaming the fields and creating traffic jams in the roads.I didn’t realize that six years later i’d return, not as a visitor, but as an organizer for the Sierra Club, working as a bison advocate. I moved to Bozeman, MT mid-April, from San Diego, CA. In the past month-and-half I’ve been here, I’ve visited the Park a few times. And each time i’m greeted by bison, and their bison calves feeding, playing, and sleeping.
To a Park visitor, bison represent iconic wildlife to the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem; but to some southwest Montana residents, bison represent the contentious politics of the region. Such contention of this magnificent creature has led to the federal and state agency slaughter and hazing of bison, with hundreds killed each year. Even helicopters are used to chase the bison back into the Park. Before I started working here, I never knew any of this. My ignorance led me to believe that of course the bison must be protected. After all, they do live in Yellowstone National Park, and what’s more protected than a national park? And I don’t think i’m alone in this line of thinking.
And while this issue has been nationalized in the past, the bison fight has gone on for too long. I find that many people are tired of hearing about bison and frustrated by the inaction and lack of state leadership. The deeper you dig into the politics and history of bison management in the region, the more twisted and counter-intuitive it all gets.
A couple weeks ago I attended a Board of Livestock meeting. At this meeting, the Board was supposed to vote on expanded bison habitat, with a “compromise” of a decreased number of bison. Instead, they chose to indefinitely postpone the vote. The livestock industry representatives bashed on bison with complete hatred, and fear, for the animal.
Despite this, there’s been progress. The proposal for expanded habitat only arose because of a citizens working group that achieved what was thought to be impossible – consensus base recommendations. The group consisted of both wildlife advocates, and representatives from the Stockgrowers Association. Furthermore, we are working with other NGOs on a coexistence fencing project to build bison tolerance with landowners surrounding the Park. And after the Board’s vote, Governor Bullock mandated that the hazing of bison can occur on private property only if there’s landowner permission.
And this is where we are. It’s 2014, with new science and knowledge surrounding brucellosis and bison, but with an outdated law and an outdated Board of Livestock. To the Park visitor this summer, I hope you respect the bison’s boundaries, and understand that after enduring a harsh winter, they have to endure a harsh haze back into the Park. To the local residents, I hope you join me, and others, in building bison tolerance, in raising awareness, and in advocating for expanded bison habitat. Just because the Board of Livestock remains inactive, doesn’t mean that we have to. Call Governor Bullock TODAY at (406) 444-3111. Urge him to take strong leadership on expanded bison habitat.
Stay tuned for future posts of this bison installment.
Kiersten Iwai is the Sierra Club’s GYE campaign’s newest organizer. Questions, comments, want to help out? Contact her at email@example.com.
Originally in thinking about what to write, I sat down to write a warm fuzzy holiday post. However, recent media headlines keep creeping into my mind: “Methane Emissions Double EPA Estimates,” “CO2 at 400ppm,” “Ocean Acidification,” as well as previous posts on this site such as Phil Knight’s excellent one on the plight of one of the gems of the GYE’s subalpine ecosystem; the whitebark pine.
This deluge of dismal news is not easy for me to digest. Therefore, I am going to break from this blog’s usual animal-centric adventure with a metaphorical connection to what’s going on in the GYE. Although, what I am about to say is definitely going on in the GYE.
I’m going to talk about the atmosphere – you know, the cleansing crisp cobalt blue we breathe deep into our lungs, while out exploring some wild corner of a mountain top. Whilst we bask in the glories of our own personal wilderness connections, we should contemplate the loss of these soul-lifting experiences with a fresh set of eyes. During these reviving experiences, if one takes time, one may also bear witness to an unfolding trauma, a dis-ease that at first glance does not cry out to the casual observer. Rather it is insidiously growing across numerous interconnected ecosystems across the globe. No system of intricate evolving parts is ever wholly stable, but a working system grows in fits and starts, trial and error, natural selection and unnatural discards. Science refers to this ability of an ecosystem to absorb and recover from upheaval as “resilience.” Thus, (a simplified example) the GYE’s forests have evolved to bounce back from fire, new and improved, rejuvenated for the better, having been conditioned by eons of fire. This symbiosis recycles nutrients released by fire and returns the released energy (in many forms) to adjust the processes of natural selection upon an evolving forest ecosystem. Science also tells us that a systems diversity of species is the lynchpin of this resilience. This malleable ability for life to thrive under change across every niche on this blue orb is truly amazing.
There is just one juggernaut of a problem with the current nutrient recycling resilience of the planet today. The planet is losing its resilience. As myriad species are winking out of existence we scramble to catalog them into neat little sterile packages. This juggernaut, this asteroid, this tectonic cataclysm is of course ourselves. All 7+ billion of us jockeying for a better position on this crashing biological locomotive, tightly gripping our modern partner in crime, unmitigated atmospheric CO2. And our exhaled resolve to continue on this speeding train is impacting us all. The logarithmically rapid rise in our society’s exhaled atmospheric CO2, (methane, nitrous oxide, CFC’s among others) is an unsustainable, physical, chemical, biological and physiological extreme comparable to a planet-wide geological cataclysm. This unmitigated CO2 release is now ubiquitous enough that science predicts it to remain as a centuries-long heating of our atmosphere. The lungs of the planet, of which countless life forms are reliant on for every breath of cell metabolism is being charred black. We are no longer witness to the extinction of just individual species, but entire concomitant ecosystems with thousands if not millions (counting microbes) of species winking out of existence in our lifetimes.
Yes, we environmentally attuned recognize these tumors on the land when we see them. We hold them up before the wider public like a radiologist holds up a lighted X-ray film and points to the cancer. Yet even in the remotest recesses of the planet there grows a cancer, the catalyst CO2, triggering myriad destructive forces all across the planet. The Great Barrier Reef, Boreal Forest, Tropical Forest, Alpine Ecosystems, Deep Ocean Currents, Arctic Ocean, African Savannah, Tundra Permafrost, Mangrove Swamps, Marine Fisheries, The Atmosphere, The Jetstream, and on and on. Every ecosystem on the planet is under severe duress due to human caused climate change. Worldwide the scientific community (IPCC, NOAA, NASA, UNEP, etc.) is more certain of this than medicine is certain that cigarette smoke causes cancer. The planet is in the first throes of a multi-system organ failure, with tendrils of elevated CO2 acting like metastatic tumors. Eventually deforming every ecosystem on the planet into an unrecognizable shell of its former diverse glory.
So, what are we, (humanity) doing about it? As the cliff approaches, governments seem paralyzed not to pull the emergency brake on this speeding soot belching locomotive. In the absence of leadership from our elected officials on climate change, people across the country are taking action at the local level. The Sierra Club is leading thousands of dedicated activists on multiple fronts to put the brakes on the climate change train. Our Beyond Coal campaign has been instrumental in closing 150 coal plants and counting. In Idaho, Beyond Coal activists recently voiced our opinion and won a Public Utilities Commission decision against Idaho Power’s efforts to invest 130+million in dirty coal. Many other actions are being taken by thousands of people to fight climate change across the country. Fabulous and encouraging work, yes. However, I am still worried that our daunting task will result in a fatalistic attitude, slowly becoming the status quo as we witness a planetary wide ecosystem collapse. I am not saying it is time to jump train and throw up our hands in failure. Instead I am saying it is time to step back, take a second look at the possibility that our movement is trending towards complacency. I do not want the movement to wither as our remaining planetary genome is stored in some sterile test tube vault.
Bill McKibben recently wrote the following in Orion, “ After a certain point, an ongoing crisis just becomes life; when a scorched earth becomes the new normal, when people can’t remember the old climate, outrage and alarm give way to resigned acceptance.” This eco-warrior seems worried as well and seems to be warning us not to throw up our hands in defeat, just yet. When I contemplate the possibility that we will “not remember the old climate” and all of its beautiful accoutrements I am scared as hell.
My reason for writing this post is to elicit the start of a conversation, an ongoing dialog, to engage in the better understanding of our fears and hopes towards protecting one of the greatest wild places left on Earth – the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem. In doing so maybe we will come to more fully understand why we work and toil under such Herculean odds as activists. After all, we have been dealt a task almost beyond human comprehension, so let us stoke the green fires that reside in us all.
I dedicate this piece to the GYE species in peril:
Grizzly bear, wolf, Canada lynx, wolverine, fisher, American marten, river otter, black footed ferret, pika, pygmy rabbit, black tailed prairie dog, N. Goshawk, boreal owl, burrowing owl, flammulated owl, sage grouse, Clarks nutcracker, three toed woodpecker, black backed woodpecker, yellow billed cuckoo, Lewis woodpecker, Baird’s sparrow, Sprague’s pipit, Whitebark pine, alpine wildflowers, and the list goes on.
As we crested a windswept 11,500’ ridge in the southeast Absarokas, one of my hiking companions Don, exclaimed, “Guys, there’s a bear!” Sure enough, a careful look with good binoculars revealed two adult grizzly bears on a steep talus slope about a half mile away. We tried to slip back over the ridge, but in spite of the large distance, the bears spooked and headed for the timber below their slope. As we got out onto the east side of the peak we hoped to summit that morning, we realized there were three more bears working a talus slope at 12,000’. Again, even though we spotted the bears at great distance, the sow and two yearling cubs sensed us and fled their feast. As we climbed further up the peak, we traversed high steep talus slopes that were covered with “moth mines” – the 5’ across, 2’deep holes that were everywhere in the talus. This was not terrain you would choose to travel across unless you were trying to scramble up the peak. The diggings, as well as the abundant bear dung, were evidence that we had invaded a very heavily used late summer moth site for grizzly bears.
Since those bear sightings, I was fortunate enough to hear Dr. David Mattson talk about bears and their food sources. Bears have lost three of their four top food sources, with moths being the only one of those top foods left. Our wonderful bear sightings demonstrate the bear’s new dependence on cutworm moths for food, and how exposed to observation this behavior makes the bears.
Dr. Mattson’s research has clearly demonstrated the importance of late summer diet to the ability of breeding sow bears to be able to produce 2 or 3 cubs, which are the numbers required for the tenuous Yellowstone bear population to maintain present numbers. Because of the disappearance of other desirable food sources, many bears in this population now are dependent on small moths that migrate from great distances each summer to the alpine zones of the Rocky Mountains. Further, the great bears must spend all day excavating these insects on totally exposed rock slopes.
I’ve also begun to understand that current grizzly bear population modeling is likely leading to inflated estimates. One big change in the way bears are counted is that the number of reconnaissance flights has increased substantially, up to three times more flights per year! I’ve hunted quite a little, and have always noticed the amount of wildlife one sees is directly proportional to the time spent in the field. I would think the same would apply to aerial surveys. When you add the fact that bears are increasingly spending more and more time on totally exposed alpine slopes to the fact that the time spent looking has tripled, it seems obvious that bear counts will rise. Just as we saw a lot of grizzly bears on our hike this summer, more frequent flights in late summer are going to see more bears because the bears have to be out on those open slopes to find the food that will get them ready for winter.
The other lesson from our Absaroka hike this summer is that, in the future, I will be prepared to change trip routes and plans if I spot bears trying to eke a living out of the alpine zone. We caused at least six bears to interrupt and flee their chosen food sources by hiking and climbing on the same mountain at the same time that they were using those sites. When I saw the moth mining zone above 12,000’, I realized that grizzly bears are presently at the extreme fringes of available food sources. I wish we had not disturbed their industrious food gathering on that mountain side. I have said many times in the past that the ideal bear sighting is at large distance above timber line. After our experiences this summer, I realize those sightings are not necessarily ideal for the bears.
The importance of establishing every level of protection possible for lands like where we hiked last summer is paramount. It is at the edges of the GYE where populations of threatened species like grizzly bears need security to expand their ranges. I will alter my recreational goals in the future to be less intrusive in these special places.
Kim Wilbert – Sierra Club member, Riverton, WY